Long Arms Cost You The Bench And Pay You Back On The Deadlift | Science Meets Gym

BIOMECHANICS · 6 MIN READ

Long Arms Cost You The Bench And Pay You Back On The Deadlift

A tall lifter at the bottom of a bench press, photographed from the side, with the barbell touching his chest and his elbows wide

In 59 competitive powerlifters, a long reach went with a stronger deadlift and did nothing measurable to the bench press. The effect is real, and here is how big it is.

The Claim

You have watched this happen in every gym. Two lifters press the same barbell for the same five reps. One is short and thick through the chest. The other is tall, with arms that hang past his pockets. They rack the bar and write down the same number.

The argument is that they did not do the same amount of work. The tall one did more.

Two flat benches side by side in a quiet gym, a lifter standing beside one of them looking down at a loaded barbell

That part is not an opinion. Work is force times distance. If the bar travels farther, moving the same load costs more energy. And the bar does travel farther for a longer arm, because the gap between a chest and a locked out elbow is set by the length of the bones in between.

Researchers have measured that gap. In 27 resistance trained lifters, the barbell moved 0.41 metres during a one rep max bench press, with a spread of about 4 centimetres either side of the average.[1] Take two of those lifters one standard deviation apart, at 0.37 and 0.45 metres, and give them both 100 kilos for five sets of five. The longer armed lifter pushes the bar 2 metres farther across the session and does about 22 percent more mechanical work for an identical line in the logbook.

So far the reel is right. The open question is whether that extra work shows up as a weaker lift.

What The Research Actually Found

The cleanest look comes from a drug tested provincial powerlifting championship in Quebec. Researchers measured 59 male classic powerlifters before they competed, across every IPF weight class, then compared their proportions with what they actually lifted on the platform.[2]

One measurement carries this story: reach divided by height. Put your arms out to the sides and measure fingertip to fingertip, then divide by your height. Above 1.0 means your arms are long for your frame.

The result split cleanly by lift. A higher reach to height ratio went with a stronger deadlift, at r = 0.27 for the raw weight and r = 0.37 once the lift was scored against body weight. Both were statistically significant. The same ratio did nothing for the bench press. Against raw bench the correlation was r = 0.00. Against body weight it was r = -0.14 and not significant. Only as a share of the lifter's three lift total did it turn negative enough to count, at r = -0.24.

A lifter silhouette with reach measured against height, and the correlation with each of the three powerlifts mapped beside it

Read that twice, because it is the reverse of how the story usually gets told. In this sample, long arms measurably helped the deadlift. They did not measurably hurt the bench.

One study does put a number on the pressing penalty. In 87 Division I college football players, adding arm length and arm girth to a bench press prediction equation made it more accurate. The weight on arm length came out at -4.60 pounds per centimetre, with arm circumference held constant.[3] Among men with similarly thick arms, every extra centimetre of arm was worth roughly 4.6 fewer pounds of predicted max. That is a real effect. It is also a coefficient inside a prediction formula, not a measured cause.

A horizontal arm silhouette above the study's average bench press drawn as a bar, with the 46 pounds that ten centimetres of extra arm is worth marked off the end of it
A lifter set up over a loaded barbell for a conventional deadlift, photographed from the side with his arms hanging straight to the bar

The pulling side has been measured with instruments as well. A linear position transducer on 23 resistance trained lifters recorded how far the bar actually moved and how much work each lift took. Taller bodies with longer legs moved the bar farther and did more work per lift, with correlations running from 0.54 to 0.68.[4] Arm length pulled the other way on the clock. Among the women in that study, longer arms went with a shorter lift time.

The mechanism in the reel is real, and it has been seen on a transducer.

What It Looks Like In Practice

You cannot change your arms. You can change how far the bar travels and where the load sits relative to your joints, and both of those are yours to set on any given set.

Grip width is the biggest lever on the bench. Fourteen trained men worked up to a one rep max at three grip widths in the same session. They pressed 109.8 kilos wide, 108.9 medium and 103.7 narrow.[5] That is about 6 kilos between the widest and the narrowest grip, on the same chest, on the same day. A wider grip shortens the bar path and moves the sticking point onto different muscles.

Three pairs of hands gripping a barbell at a wide, a medium and a narrow grip, with the one rep max lifted at each width

Three things worth doing with that:

Close view of a lifter's hands set wide on a knurled barbell before a bench press

References

  1. Lockie RG, Callaghan SJ, Moreno MR, et al. An investigation of the mechanics and sticking region of a one-repetition maximum close-grip bench press versus the traditional bench press. Sports (Basel). 2017;5(3):46. doi:10.3390/sports5030046
  2. Ferland PM, Laurier A, Comtois AS. Relationships between anthropometry and maximal strength in male classic powerlifters. International Journal of Exercise Science. 2020;13(4):1512-1531. PMC7745913
  3. Hetzler RK, Schroeder BL, Wages JJ, Stickley CD, Kimura IF. Anthropometry increases 1 repetition maximum predictive ability of NFL-225 test for Division IA college football players. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2010;24(6):1429-1439. doi:10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181d682fa
  4. Lockie RG, Moreno MR, Orjalo AJ, et al. Relationships between height, arm length, and leg length on the mechanics of the conventional and high-handle hexagonal bar deadlift. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2018;32(11):3011-3019. doi:10.1519/JSC.0000000000002256
  5. Larsen S, Gomo O, van den Tillaar R. A biomechanical analysis of wide, medium, and narrow grip width effects on kinematics, horizontal kinetics, and muscle activity on the sticking region in recreationally trained males during 1-RM bench pressing. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living. 2021;2:637066. doi:10.3389/fspor.2020.637066
  6. Cholewa JM, Atalag O, Zinchenko A, Johnson K, Henselmans M. Anthropometrical determinants of deadlift variant performance. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine. 2019;18(3):448-453. PMC6683626
  7. Keith DS, Scherrer D, Nunley B, et al. Anthropometric predictors of conventional deadlift kinematics and kinetics: a preliminary study. International Journal of Exercise Science. 2023;16(1):429-447. doi:10.70252/CVQH8240
  8. Reya M, Škarabot J, Cvetičanin B, Šarabon N. Factors underlying bench press performance in elite competitive powerlifters. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2021;35(8):2179-2186. doi:10.1519/JSC.0000000000003097
  9. Lawson ED, Cottrell GT. Factors related to weighted pull-up performance in Canadian recreational to competitive calisthenics athletes. SportRxiv preprint, 2026. sportrxiv.org
Chris Bennett

Chris Bennett

Senior writer

Chris Bennett is a house byline for Science Meets Gym. Gear published under it is bought at retail and trained with before anything gets a verdict, and every claim about training outcomes is checked against the published research first.

Read full bio

Science Meets Gym earns a commission when you buy through some of the links on this page. It never changes which products we recommend or how they score.